I. The Convergence of Process Intelligence and Optimization
The contemporary business environment mandates continuous adaptation to rapid technological advancements, particularly within the domains of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation.[1] Organizations are strategically shifting their focus from isolated efficiency projects to holistic, integrated enterprise transformation, driven by next-generation process intelligence and automation tools.
A. Defining the Modern Process Landscape: From RPA to Hyperautomation
The core evolution in optimization is the transition of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) from a standalone task automation tool to an integral component of intelligent systems.[2] RPA is no longer sufficient on its own; enterprises must leverage this technology in combination with advanced cognitive capabilities to address complex, end-to-end challenges.
This necessitates the adoption of Hyperautomation, which is strategically defined as the fusion of RPA with Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning (ML), Process Mining, and advanced analytics.[3] This integrated approach allows systems to manage processes that involve unstructured data, learn from previous outcomes, and make intelligent, data-driven decisions that improve over time.[1] This allows for the automation of complex, end-to-end business workflows, moving far beyond simple, highly repetitive tasks.[1, 3]
This Hyperautomation mandate imposes significant architectural imperatives. Traditional, monolithic, on-premise deployments are being replaced by modern RPA solutions that are inherently cloud-native, scalable, and API-first.[4] This architecture is not merely a market preference; it is an operational prerequisite. Maximizing the potential of Hyperautomation requires intense data exchange, high computational demand, and seamless integration with other Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platforms and external AI services. Without this modern foundation, intelligent components cannot efficiently operate or scale. Consequently, Hyperautomation is maturing into a comprehensive business operating model rather than a project-based initiative.[4] For instance, platforms such as IBM’s Watson Orchestrate already exemplify this convergence by integrating AI and RPA to automate sophisticated HR and finance workflows, capable of analyzing intent and autonomously triggering necessary actions, significantly reducing human involvement in repetitive decision-making processes.[1]
This evolution also fundamentally redefines the return on investment (ROI). Traditional RPA focused primarily on transactional efficiency and labor cost reduction. However, the integration of AI allows Hyperautomation systems to embed intelligence and self-correction, enabling them to learn from outcomes and drive smarter and more independent decisions.[1, 2] The implication is that the primary ROI measurement is shifting from raw transactional volume to strategic quality improvements, such as improved prediction accuracy, compliance adherence, and risk reduction, requiring the establishment of new, outcome-based metrics for success.
B. Advanced Process Discovery: The Synergy of Process and Task Mining
Before automation can be safely and effectively deployed, advanced process intelligence is mandatory. Digital transformation initiatives are frequently delayed or undermined by processes that are fundamentally misunderstood.[5] The modern approach relies on two complementary discovery techniques: Process Mining and Task Mining.
Process Mining operates at the top-down, system level. This technique analyzes system event logs generated by core business applications (e.g., ERP, CRM) to visualize, map, and monitor end-to-end business processes.[6, 7] Its primary function is identifying bottlenecks, revealing process deviations, and highlighting strategic areas for system-level improvement.[6] The market clearly recognizes its value; the global process analytics market is expected to grow substantially, and process mining is growing at an estimated 40% to 50% annually.[5] The data confirms that process mining is critical for accelerating and de-risking RPA projects. Organizations utilizing process mining during RPA implementation have achieved significant benefits, including increasing the business value by 40%, reducing implementation time by 50%, and cutting project risk by 60%.[5]
Task Mining operates at the bottom-up, user level. This method examines granular user interactions at the interface level, tracking specific actions such as mouse clicks and keystrokes.[6] This provides necessary detail on how tasks are executed, highlighting inefficiencies in execution and enhancing individual user productivity.[6, 7]
These two methodologies are not interchangeable; they are complementary, providing a crucial 360-degree view of operations.[6] Process mining provides the macro, “bird’s eye view” of the overall workflow, identifying what happened, while task mining offers the micro, “ant’s view” detailing the specific steps and user behavior within that process.[7] The necessity of this integrated approach implies that the capital expenditure on process intelligence tools functions as a necessary insurance policy for the much larger investment in Hyperautomation deployment.
Despite the proven benefits, a significant operational maturity gap exists. While 93% of business decision makers report wanting to apply process mining within their organizations, 79% indicate they have never utilized the technique.[5] This disconnect between awareness and adoption highlights a critical challenge for Chief Digital Officers: the need to rapidly focus on training, tooling procurement, and organizational integration of process mining expertise, typically facilitated through a central governance body, to bridge this gap and unlock value.
The table below summarizes the roles of these key intelligence tools in the process optimization toolkit:
The Process Intelligence Toolkit: Process Mining, Task Mining, and DTO
| Metric | Process Mining | Task Mining | Digital Twin of Organization (DTO) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Source | System Event Logs (ERP, CRM) | User Interface Interactions (Clicks, Keystrokes) | Real-time Data Streams + Event Logs + Modeling |
| Scope of Analysis | Broad, end-to-end business workflows (Macro/Bird’s Eye View) | Specific, individual tasks within a workflow (Micro/Ant’s View) | Enterprise-wide system simulation and scenario planning |
| Primary Value | Identifies bottlenecks, compliance deviations, and strategic areas for system-level improvement | Enhances task-level efficiency and identifies user productivity gaps | Simulates change, predicts outcomes, and optimizes based on ‘what-if’ scenarios |
| Relationship | Provides top-down insights | Provides bottom-up detail on execution | Provides predictive, prescriptive modeling using combined insights |
C. Strategic Process Modeling: The Digital Twin of an Organization (DTO)
Building upon process and task mining, the most advanced trend in optimization is the deployment of the Digital Twin of an Organization (DTO). The DTO is a dynamic, simulated representation of the entire enterprise, combining digital twin technology with process mining to create a governed, living model of processes, people, and systems.[5, 8, 9]
The DTO provides necessary prescriptive power by allowing organizations to simulate proposed changes, test various “what-if” scenarios, and quantify the impact of process redesigns or strategic shifts before committing real-world resources.[5, 9, 10] This capability delivers faster, safer, and more confident transformation.[9] The returns are potentially nonlinear; for example, in the mining industry, process digital twin technology has been posited to achieve a return on investment of 20X or even 40X by preventing costly, unplanned downtime and optimizing throughput.[11] This predictive, pre-emptive capability provides returns that vastly exceed those achieved through purely reactive efficiency gains.
DTOs yield significant benefits across multiple operational dimensions:
• Operational Resilience: Organizations can run simulations to assess the impact of supply chain disruptions, staffing risks, or new regulatory changes, allowing for proactive mitigation planning.[9]
• Customer Experience (CX) Improvement: By modeling customer interactions and service processes, a DTO can identify pain points in the customer journey and simulate changes to service protocols to enhance overall satisfaction.[10, 12]
• Continuous Improvement: Because the DTO receives a continuous flow of real-time operational data, the digital twin is constantly learning and adapting, enabling a true culture of continuous, data-driven improvement.[10]
However, the effectiveness of a DTO is directly proportional to the organization’s historical investment in data governance and clean architecture. The success of DTO implementation hinges on maintaining continuous access to real-time data while ensuring integrity.[13] Significant challenges arise from complexity, including the difficulty of integrating data from legacy systems, which is often incomplete, inconsistently formatted, or less reliable than data from modern sources.[10, 13] This demonstrates that DTOs serve as operational mirrors of data maturity: poor data quality will inevitably lead to inaccurate simulation outputs, thereby eroding confidence and impeding adoption.
To govern this complexity, Enterprise Architecture (EA) frameworks are essential. EA tools, which traditionally provide a static view of organizational systems, must be extended to include DTO-specific elements. This supports the governance, ensures traceability, and positions the DTO not just as a technology project, but as a long-term strategic asset that supports model-driven engineering practices.[8, 13] Implementation also requires addressing organizational and cultural barriers, fostering a mindset shift toward data-centric practices that often contradict established routines.[13]
II. Hyperautomation and the Rise of Autonomous Workflows
The next frontier of optimization is not merely automation, but the achievement of truly autonomous, intelligent workflows capable of self-correction and complex decision-making.
A. Architectural Evolution: Intelligent Automation and Agentic Systems
The evolution from traditional RPA to Intelligent Automation involves integrating AI to overcome previous limitations, particularly the handling of unstructured data.[1] This allows automation systems to learn and integrate context into their actions.
The culmination of this trend is Agentic Process Automation. Agentic AI signifies AI moving to enterprise scale, driving independent, smarter decision-making, which is expected to take center stage in the coming years.[2, 4] Agentic systems enable autonomous, high-impact workflows by providing the capability for self-correction and dynamic adaptation.[4] The necessary architectural transition toward cloud-native and API-first platforms is foundational to supporting the rapid scaling and integration of the required ML/AI components necessary for true intelligent automation.[4]
Simultaneously, the development and deployment of automation is being democratized through Low-Code/No-Code (LCNC) RPA platforms. These tools empower “citizen developers”—business users—to automate workflows independently.[3, 4] This decentralization makes automation more accessible and significantly enhances enterprise-wide scalability.
However, the increasing autonomy of these systems demands a corresponding increase in governance. Since agentic AI systems are designed to make independent decisions and potentially alter workflows [2], the risk profile associated with errors in financial or compliance-related workflows is significantly elevated. Governance frameworks must evolve beyond simply auditing system performance to rigorously auditing the AI model’s decision criteria and establishing strict ethical and compliance guardrails before deployment. Centralizing this decision oversight, typically within a specialized Center of Excellence, becomes imperative.
B. Generative AI as an Optimization Accelerator
Generative AI (GenAI), which is adaptive and trained using unsupervised learning to generate unique content [14, 15], is proving to be a powerful accelerator within the optimization lifecycle itself, distinct from the predefined, rules-based tasks executed by traditional AI.[14]
GenAI’s versatility is transforming the way organizations approach process redesign, modeling, and testing:
• Code Generation: GenAI can accelerate application development and significantly speed up the creation and customization of automation bots through code suggestions based on developer input.[16]
• Synthetic Data Generation: GenAI models can generate synthetic data based on real or synthetic structures. This capability is crucial for training complex ML models, particularly when real datasets are small, imbalanced, or sensitive, thereby supporting robust DTO simulations and model validation.[16, 17]
• Advanced Analysis and Reporting: GenAI can automatically extract and summarize data from massive volumes of documents and subsequently generate automated financial reports, summaries, and projections, accelerating the crucial analysis phase of optimization projects and reducing errors.[16]
• Complex Scenario Optimization: GenAI is being utilized to evaluate and optimize complex scenarios, such as logistics and supply chain planning, leading to cost reduction.[16]
The ability of GenAI to rapidly generate data and code means it significantly reduces the time previously spent on the labor-intensive design, modeling, and testing phases of optimization projects. Its primary value shifts the focus from using AI to run an optimized process to using AI to design the optimized process with unprecedented speed, thereby yielding a second-order productivity gain in organizational change management and development velocity.
III. Transforming Operational Support with AIOps and GenAI
The operational support environment, specifically IT Service Management (ITSM), is transitioning from a reactive, ticket-based model to a proactive, predictive, and conversational service model.
A. Predictive Support: Shifting ITSM from Reactive to Proactive
AIOps (AI for IT Operations) involves the application of AI to operational data to manage infrastructure and service desks.[18] This technology is driving a mandatory shift in ITSM toward predictive and preventive service delivery.[19, 20]
The core capabilities of AIOps are designed to create a self-aware, “self-healing” environment:
• Issue Prediction and Prevention: AIOps platforms analyze historical data, technician expertise, and resolution patterns to identify, predict, and ultimately prevent service issues before they even manifest as user tickets.[18, 20] Over time, these models can spot subtle patterns, such as recurring slowdowns after a software patch, enabling proactive intervention.[20]
• Root Cause Analysis and Remediation: AIOps provides in-depth analysis to rapidly identify the root causes of problems, events, and trends.[19] Crucially, AIOps is designed to automatically respond to and remediate issues directly, facilitating autonomous resolution with minimal human intervention.[19]
• Capacity and Resource Management: The technology provides more accurate predictions for capacity planning and optimizes resource utilization, particularly important in complex multi-cloud environments.[18]
The convergence of AIOps (for prediction and prevention) and Agentic Automation (for autonomous remediation) creates a paradigm where IT environments become increasingly self-aware and self-correcting. This critical development shifts the primary role of human IT staff away from front-line troubleshooting and toward sophisticated governance, complex architecture design, and the management of the AI/ML models that power the AIOps platform.
B. Maximizing Self-Service through Conversational AI
Scaling IT organizations requires maximizing self-service capabilities, often through the strategic deployment of GenAI-powered Virtual Agents (VAs).[21] These agents handle routine user requests, allowing human technicians to address more challenging, complex incidents.[21]
GenAI VAs leverage Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Natural Language Understanding (NLU) to move beyond rigid, keyword-based constraints. They can interpret and understand the context and semantic nuances of user requests, enabling human-like decision-making in customer service and document-heavy domains.[4, 20]
A critical success factor for conversational AI is the use of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). RAG enhances the intelligence and trustworthiness of the AI by allowing it to securely pull relevant, accurate information directly from the enterprise knowledge base, ensuring VAs provide contextually appropriate answers and tailored recommendations.[22] This RAG-enhanced self-service functionality significantly accelerates the resolution of issues and reduces the overall workload for service agents.[22]
The results of this strategic shift are quantifiable: GenAI-driven self-service can resolve up to 60% of tickets and yield a 50% increase in agent productivity.[22] Highly successful organizations deploy AI agents systematically as a strategic capability, focusing on high-value use cases to achieve substantial return on investment, often within the first year.[23]
The performance of these GenAI agents is directly limited by the accuracy and depth of the internal knowledge base accessed via RAG. If RAG pulls irrelevant or conflicting information, the virtual agent will fail to resolve the issue. Therefore, the strategic importance of Knowledge-Centered Service (KCS) principles is amplified. Organizations must immediately integrate KCS into their daily support tasks to ensure the continuous improvement and reliability of the knowledge base, positioning knowledge management as a critical operational function necessary for effective self-service.[22]
IV. Organizational Resilience and Governance Frameworks
Technology adoption, particularly Hyperautomation and AI, cannot succeed without a parallel evolution in organizational structure and governance methodology. These frameworks ensure that speed and agility do not compromise security, compliance, or strategic alignment.
A. Establishing a Process Center of Excellence (CoE) for Transformation
A Process Center of Excellence (CoE) is mandatory for sustainable transformation. A CoE centralizes scarce, high-demand capabilities, such as expertise, specialized knowledge, and change leadership, addressing skills deficits across the organization.[24, 25]
The strategic necessity of the CoE is realized through several key benefits:
• Risk Elimination and Focus: CoEs provide a dedicated focus, insulating long-term strategic efforts from the immediate pressures of day-to-day business demands, thereby eliminating risks associated with decentralized, ad-hoc expertise.[26]
• Efficiency and Quality: CoEs deliver rapid results by eliminating organizational bottlenecks, optimizing costs, and improving the quality of services and products.[24]
• Knowledge Management and Scaling: CoE members, often acting as coaches, facilitate the continuous improvement cycle by identifying and sharing effective techniques, capturing viable practices to build organizational memory, and initiating Communities of Practice (CoPs) to scale educational efforts.[25]
With the complexity introduced by Agentic Automation and DTOs, the CoE’s role has strategically shifted from being a technology gatekeeper to becoming a hybrid coaching and metrics hub. The CoE requires a diversified skill set capable of providing specialized coaching in areas like data science, Agile methodology, and Lean Six Sigma.[25] It must emphasize change leadership, facilitate the seamless integration of methodologies, and maintain rigorous metric governance to justify the sustained strategic investment in autonomy and optimization.
B. The Unified Process Framework: Integrating Methodologies
Modern operational excellence requires successfully harmonizing the structured rigor of established improvement methodologies with the speed of contemporary software development practices. This necessitates a unified process framework that integrates Lean Six Sigma, Agile, and DevOps.
Lean Six Sigma (LSS) provides the analytical foundation, combining Lean’s focus on speed and waste reduction with Six Sigma’s focus on quality, variation control, and consistency.[27] LSS uses the structured DMAIC framework to streamline processes, reduce costs, and improve customer satisfaction.[27] It defines the what and why of the optimization effort—the identification of the value stream and the elimination of waste.[28]
Agile and DevOps provide the necessary speed and flow. Agile is an iterative approach focusing on delivering value in smaller increments, continuously evaluating requirements, and responding to feedback.[29] DevOps drives communication and collaboration between development and operations teams, dramatically increasing the speed and quality of software deployment.[29] Elite DevOps teams release 208 times more frequently and 106 times faster than low-performing teams.[29] These methods define the how—the continuous flow and speed of implementation.[28]
This hybrid model is critical for digital organizations.[30] However, traditional LSS relies heavily on manual data extraction and statistical analysis.[31] Given the vast volumes of structured and unstructured data in modern enterprises [31], Lean Six Sigma methods cannot scale effectively without integrating advanced process intelligence tools (process mining, AI, and analytics). The methodology itself must be digitized to handle the velocity and complexity of modern data, ensuring analytical rigor maintains pace with deployment speed.
C. Governing the Low-Code/No-Code (LCNC) Citizen Developer Movement
LCNC platforms offer incredible agility, empowering business technologists to automate workflows and solve immediate problems independently, bypassing traditional IT gatekeeping.[4, 32]
However, this democratization, if unguarded, introduces significant operational and security risks:
• Security and Compliance: Without oversight, citizen-developed solutions risk data leaks and compliance violations.[33]
• Fragmentation and Technical Debt: Solutions built without central guidance often lack necessary testing, documentation, and code management, leading to fragile applications, data silos, and redundant “Frankenstein” systems.[32]
• Erosion of Data Trust: Different departments may build separate, conflicting dashboards to track the same metric, undermining trust in enterprise data.[32]
A robust LCNC governance framework is therefore mandatory to ensure that the agility gained is secure, stable, and strategically aligned.[32] This governance should be managed by the CoE and implement several key elements:
• Guiding Vision: IT leadership must define a long-term technological vision that all citizen-developed applications must align with, ensuring purposeful innovation.[32]
• IT Collaboration: The IT department must shift its role from gatekeeper to collaborator, overseeing and sanctioning the resources used, while ensuring security requirements are met.[32, 33]
• Mandatory Standards: This includes establishing strict security protocols, requiring documentation for application longevity, and investing in training that equips citizen developers with necessary skills beyond the platform basics.[32, 33]
Implementing prescriptive governance early ensures that the organization maintains secure and sustainable agility. Governance serves as a velocity multiplier, not an inhibitor, by preventing the crippling technical debt and costly remediation efforts that inevitably arise from unchecked, fragile solutions.
Essential Components of Low-Code/No-Code Governance
| Governance Element | Strategic Function | Risk Mitigated |
|---|---|---|
| Guiding Vision & Alignment | Defines the long-term technological direction for citizen development | Fragmentation and “Frankenstein” systems [32] |
| Role Shift: IT as Collaborator | Moves IT from a restrictive gatekeeper to an enabler and overseer | Resistance to change and shadow IT development [32] |
| Mandatory Documentation | Ensures application longevity, maintenance, and auditability | Fragile solutions built without testing or maintenance planning [32] |
| Security and Access Control | Establishes strict rules for data handling and platform access | Data leaks and compliance violations [33] |
| Training & Certification | Equips citizen developers with security and development best practices | Poor quality code and lack of trust in data [32, 33] |
V. Measuring Success and Future Strategic Imperatives
Strategic leaders must set realistic expectations regarding the ROI of new technologies and emphasize integrating data governance directly with AI strategies.[34] Quantifiable metrics must move beyond simple cost cutting to capture the value derived from improved quality, speed, and resilience.
A. Quantifying Value: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Return on Investment (ROI)
Quantifying value in the autonomous enterprise requires specialized KPIs aligned with the specific function of the technology deployed.
For Process Intelligence and Hyperautomation: Value is measured significantly through the mitigation of project risk and the subsequent acceleration of high-value process implementation. Process mining, for instance, is directly linked to increasing the business value of RPA efforts by up to 40% and reducing implementation time by 50%.[5] For the Digital Twin of an Organization (DTO), the value is captured through improved resilience and operational performance, including up to a 30% reduction in operational downtime, 20% to 25% improvement in asset utilization, and a 10% to 15% reduction in operating costs.[35] High-end DTO applications that enable complex scenario testing have shown potential for high-impact returns, such as 20X to 40X ROI in specialized industries.[11]
For Intelligent Support and AIOps: Value is measured through improved service delivery metrics and enhanced productivity. GenAI virtual agents and advanced self-service initiatives have demonstrated high rates of case deflection, resolving up to 60% of tickets through self-service and increasing human agent productivity by 50%.[22] Successful, scaled deployment of AI agents across the enterprise yields substantial ROI within the first year.[23]
The data confirms that for DTO deployments, ROI ceases to be a singular goal and instead becomes an unavoidable result when organizations are able to understand their operations clearly through trusted, connected, contextual data.[35] This implies that the highest returns are captured by investments that provide real-time, measurable visibility (Process Mining, DTO, AIOps), allowing the continuous monitoring of key indicators such as averted downtime and waste reduction.[35] Furthermore, while pilot projects may achieve high initial ROI, scaling systematically—deploying multiple agents and focusing on building internal expertise and governance—is the critical difference between project success and generating sustained enterprise value.[23]
Quantifiable Operational Benefits and ROI Across Key Transformation Pillars
| Pillar | Key Metric | Typical Improvement Range | Source Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Process Mining | Increased RPA Business Value | Up to 40% | [5] |
| Process Mining | Reduced RPA Implementation Time | Up to 50% | [5] |
| Digital Twin (DTO) | Operational Downtime Reduction | Up to 30% | [35] |
| Digital Twin (DTO) | Asset Utilization Improvement | 20% to 25% | [35] |
| Intelligent Support | Self-Service Ticket Resolution | Up to 60% | [22] |
| Intelligent Support | Agent Productivity Increase | Up to 50% | [22] |
| Strategic Investment | ROI Potential (Advanced Twins) | 20X to 40X | [11] |
B. Future Outlook and Strategic Investment Roadmap
Looking toward 2025 and 2026, the primary trends emphasize movement toward autonomous decision-making and heightened volatility in the technology and security landscape.[34, 36] Success will be defined by an organization’s ability to integrate these disparate technologies into a unified, resilient system.
Strategic Investment Priorities for the Next 18-36 Months:
1. Mandate Data Maturity: Prioritize remediation of data integrity issues, particularly those stemming from legacy systems, to establish the foundational clean architecture necessary to support high-fidelity DTO models and reliable RAG-powered virtual agents.[13, 22]
2. Formalize the Hybrid Process CoE: Invest in the Process Center of Excellence to create a dedicated hub for capability development, integrating Lean Six Sigma rigor with Agile/DevOps speed, and providing the centralized governance structure necessary to safely oversee the LCNC citizen developer ecosystem and autonomous agent deployment.[25, 32]
3. Invest in Agentic Capabilities and Scaling: Shift technology budgets to focus on developing the internal expertise necessary for deploying and managing AI/ML models, treating agent deployment as a core organizational capability rather than a series of one-off technical projects.[23]
4. Drive Cultural Adoption: Provide strong leadership and communication to facilitate the necessary mindset shift toward data-centric practices and acceptance of autonomous operations across all organizational levels.[13]
VI. Conclusion
The future of process optimization and support resides in the intelligent convergence of advanced process intelligence with autonomous execution. The transition from rules-based RPA to self-correcting, Agentic AI, underpinned by the diagnostic power of Process Mining and the predictive capabilities of the Digital Twin of an Organization, is non-negotiable for competitive advantage.
Operational resilience will increasingly rely on AIOps to predict and prevent failures, while GenAI-powered service desks, securely tethered to reliable enterprise knowledge via RAG, will redefine internal service delivery. Crucially, the technological investment must be mirrored by an organizational commitment to robust governance. Establishing a hybrid Process Center of Excellence, capable of unifying Lean Six Sigma analysis with Agile deployment speeds and strictly governing the decentralized LCNC movement, is the single most critical factor ensuring that the promise of autonomy is achieved securely and sustainably. Success will ultimately be determined not by the adoption of singular tools, but by the strategic integration and governance of these autonomous assets as a unified, resilient organizational nervous system.
——————————————————————————–
1. Latest Trends in AI and Hyper Automation – CIO Influence, https://cioinfluence.com/featured/latest-trends-in-ai-and-hyper-automation/
2. Top 12 Business AI & Automation Trends to Watch – Signity Software Solutions, https://www.signitysolutions.com/blog/ai-and-automation-trends-for-business
3. Robotic Process Automation Trends in 2026 – Perimattic, https://perimattic.com/robotic-process-automation-trends/
4. RPA in 2025: Trends, Tools, and What CIOs Should Prepare For – Auxiliobits, https://www.auxiliobits.com/blog/rpa-in-2025-trends-tools-and-what-cios-should-prepare-for/
5. 6 Process Mining Trends & 20 Stats to Watch for – Research AIMultiple, https://research.aimultiple.com/process-mining-trends/
6. Task Mining vs Process Mining: Comparison Guide – ABBYY, https://www.abbyy.com/blog/task-mining-vs-process-mining/
7. Process Mining vs Task Mining | ProcessMaker, https://www.processmaker.com/blog/process-mining-vs-task-mining/
8. What Is a Digital Twin and How Do They Work? – Ardoq, https://www.ardoq.com/knowledge-hub/digital-twin
9. how a digital twin of your organisation (DTO) transforms business performance from the inside out – Infosys BPM, https://www.infosysbpm.com/blogs/global-capability-centers/digital-twin-of-organisation-benefits.html
10. What Is Digital Twin Technology in Business? Definition and Examples – iGrafx, https://www.igrafx.com/blog/what-is-digital-twin-technology-in-business/
11. The Benefits of Process Digital Twin Technology in the Mining Industry – Simio, https://www.simio.com/benefits-process-digital-twin-technology-mining-industry/
12. 15 Digital Twin Applications/ Use Cases by Industry – Research AIMultiple, https://research.aimultiple.com/digital-twin-applications/
13. (PDF) Digital Twins of an Organization for Enterprise Modeling – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346629528_Digital_Twins_of_an_Organization_for_Enterprise_Modeling
14. Generative AI vs Other Types of AI – Microsoft, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/ai-101/generative-ai-vs-other-types-of-ai
16. Generative AI Use Cases and Resources – AWS, https://aws.amazon.com/ai/generative-ai/use-cases/
17. What is Generative AI? | IBM, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/generative-ai
18. What is AIOps? A Comprehensive AIOps Intro – Splunk, https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/learn/aiops.html
19. What is AIOps? – ServiceNow, https://www.servicenow.com/products/it-operations-management/what-is-aiops.html
20. The Rise of the Self-Healing Service Desk: Ending the L1 Workload Crisis with AI Agents, https://itsm.tools/self-healing-service-desk-ai-agents/
21. ITSM Virtual Agent – ServiceNow, https://www.servicenow.com/docs/bundle/zurich-it-service-management/page/product/itsm-virtual-agent/concept/itsm-virtual-agent.html
22. ITSM Knowledge Management – Servicely.ai, https://www.servicely.ai/itsm/knowledge-management
23. The ROI of AI: Agents are delivering for business now | Google Cloud Blog, https://cloud.google.com/transform/roi-of-ai-how-agents-help-business
24. Everything You Need to Know About Centers of Excellence – Catalant, https://catalant.com/coe-everything-you-need-to-know-about-centers-of-excellence/
25. Centers of Excellence (CoEs) – Disciplined Agile – PMI, https://www.pmi.org/disciplined-agile/people/centers-of-excellence
26. What is Center of Excellence (CoE) | Zinnov, https://zinnov.com/centers-of-excellence/what-is-center-of-excellence-coe-and-why-should-organizations-set-it-up-blog/
27. Lean Six Sigma: Everything You Need to Know, https://www.6sigmacertificationonline.com/what-is-lean-six-sigma/
28. Connection Between Lean, Agile, DevOps, Six-Sigma, ITSM, Scrum, https://worldofagile.com/blog/connection-between-lean-agile-devops-six-sigma-itsm-scrum/
29. DevOps Best Practices – Atlassian, https://www.atlassian.com/devops/what-is-devops/devops-best-practices
30. Agile and Lean Six Sigma integration: a Leadership framework – Purdue e-Pubs, https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=iclss
31. Reimagining process excellence in banking: Integrating Lean Six Sigma & AI in a new era of continuous improvement, https://www.processexcellencenetwork.com/lean-six-sigma-business-performance/articles/reimagining-process-excellence-in-banking-integrating-lean-six-sigma-ai-in-a-new-era-of-continuous-improvement
32. Low-Code/No-Code Governance: How to Balance Agility and Risk – LIDD Consultants, https://lidd.com/low-code-no-code-governance/
33. What is Low-Code Governance | Microsoft Power Apps, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/power-platform/products/power-apps/topics/low-code-no-code/what-is-low-code-governance-and-why-it-is-necessary
34. AI Predictions for 2025: Insights from Forrester and Gartner – Kenility, https://www.kenility.com/blog/ai-predictions/
35. Measuring ROI in Digital Twin deployments. – Entopy, https://www.entopy.com/measuring-roi-in-digital-twin-deployments/
36. Predictions 2026: The Race To Trust And Value – Forrester, https://www.forrester.com/predictions/
Journal for Policy & Market Research 
Leave a comment